Jump to content

FourtyFours

Trial Moderator
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About FourtyFours

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

FourtyFours's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/15)

  • Collaborator
  • Dedicated
  • Week One Done
  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. This suggestion, while taking realism into account, isn’t the entire point. It isn’t really fun to fight a CI with an RPG due to the fact it’s basically an instant win for the CI in question. If guns need to be balanced, then they should be balanced but relying on one weapon that instantly kills people who can’t react to it (As it’s impossible due to the close quarters nature of it) isn’t fun. I think the RPG outdoors is fine, but indoors makes raids completely unfair. If guns aren’t balanced? Suggest the balance.
  2. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Link to Content: N/A. Suggestion: Make it prohibited to utilise RPGs in doors. Reason for addition/change?: It wouldn't make logical sense due to the back-blast and also the deafening sound of the explosive in doors would stun EVERYBODY. I think it'd be balanced for raids and stuff...But outdoors should be free game. Any pros/cons of the addition/change?: Raids more balanced, might piss people off.
  3. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Link to Content: N/A. Suggestion: Increase the damage / buff the D-Class weapons so it's viable AND (Or) decrease the price it's made. Reason for addition/change?: As of right now, the balance with D-Class is very against them and one-sided towards the GSD. I've seen D-Class jump GSD and yet they still lose due to the majority of the weapons being unviable. The only viable (And that's even pushing it) gun is the Waterpipe shotgun and EVEN THEN, it isn't the best and relies on D-Class hugging their target. Any pros/cons of the addition/change?: Makes PVP more balanced for D-Class and makes GSD adapt to the issue.
  4. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Link to Content: N/A. Suggestion: Nerf SCP-682's current speed. Reason for addition/change?: SCP-682's speed outmatches everyone and he can just get free kills / size-ups since NOBODY can outrun him. The breach just becomes impossible to contain unless there's multiple GSD / MTF on to focus fire (Which there isn't 90% of the time). Give him a speed boost with a right click after he roars, then slows down. The perfect balance. Any pros/cons of the addition/change?: Makes 682 more balanced. I don't see a con.
  5. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Your STEAMID: STEAM_0:0:170921441 Bug Found?: Multiple jobs are missing multiple things (And some need replacements). How can the issue be recreated?: N/A Evidence: N/A DOCUMENTATION THAT INCLUDES ALL FIX & REQUESTS (Some are high priority).
  6. We tried these models. They have no head hit box, and we don't know anyone that can give us head hit boxes for balance. AS MUCH AS I LOVE THEM, I cannot allow them 😞
  7. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Your STEAMID: STEAM_0:0:170921441 Bug Found?: Not being able to see the job I'm not whitelisted on in the F4 menu. How can the issue be recreated?: N/A. Evidence:
  8. Your Name: Site Defence General D. Ambrose Your STEAMID: STEAM_0:0:170921441 Bug Found?: Site Defence General has a Clearance Level Card 1 Keycard (Should be Level 5). How can the issue be recreated?: N/A. Evidence:
  9. -Support You posted an image of your application in the general chat, which is classified as advertisement of an application.
  10. Follow the format cuhh.
  11. I will literally donate for this to be a thing. + Support
  12. Use the format cuhhh
  13. Neutral Maybe if I see you more on (When the server gets up), I'll make my choice? Good application but I want to see how the person acts before I give my two cents, Deputy Site Director isn't some secretary position.
  14. +Support for 1, 3 and 5. 1. SCP cooldowns and Surface breach preventions for 5 minutes (Should honestly be 10 minutes to give SCPs time to kill people, since that's their job) would do us a favour. I recommend 10 minutes for surface prevention and 15 minutes for breach cooldown. 3. Elaboration for 173's cleaning should be provided since 173 players bullshit their way through 100% of the time. 5. That's already a thing. Neutral for 2. 2. Infils as of right now keep going into the facility, there needs to be a cooldown for infils specifically with a one life rule considering how much of a hassle they can be. Perhaps a disguise system could work since it's more effective. -Support for 4. 4. This is an IC thing that is up to Site Administration, not staff.
×
×
  • Create New...